This reflection on life requires us to extend the lectionary reading to include the testing of King Solomon’s newly granted wisdom.
How did Solomon know which baby belonged to which woman? Wisdom is not some supernatural ability to know what to do in particular situation, but a general and keen understanding of how things are, how the world works, how we work. Solomon simply recognized the bond between mother and child that caused the real mother to make the most difficult of decisions for the welfare of her baby, even if it cost her a lifetime of wondering, not knowing what would become of her son. It mattered not that she, a prostitute, bore the baby out of wedlock. He was her son.
If Solomon could be so sure of the bond between mother and child, why does this bond appear so fragile that 1.2 million times each year it fails to protect the unborn child? Has human nature changed?
Let me make two suggestions. First, we live in a culture increasingly hostile to life. For example, our culture expects that sex should be readily available, and without consequence, particularly pregnancy. Supporting this commitment to consequence-free sex are the twin pillars of contraception and abortion. While abortion advocates deny that abortion is used as a means of birth control, it is noteworthy that the Supreme Court used precisely this reasoning in arguing for the legitimacy, even the necessity, of abortion. According to Planned Parenthood v Casey, [t]he Roe rule’s limitation on state power could not be repudiated without serious inequity to people who, for two decades of economic and social developments, have organized intimate relationships and made choices that define their views of themselves and their places in society, in reliance on the availability of abortion in the event that contraception should fail.
That the court is using abortion to protect, even promote, sexual license could not be clearer. And, lest we assume this is simply an issue in the secular world, the Christian community has largely separated sex from pregnancy, indicated by our (often unreflective) acceptance of contraception. When we accept the notion that sex can be rightly separated from childbearing, pregnancy often becomes an unexpected event, something that has gone wrong. Such thinking can only weaken the bond between a mother and her child. In the end, the commitment to sexual license requires that we ignore the bond between mother and child.
Secondly, we too readily assume that a mother who has aborted a child actually desired that abortion. Recently, I read an article dismissing the suggestion that a clinic intake interview should include the question, “Are you the one who wants this abortion?”, claiming that the answer would be obvious. Well, perhaps not. We know that, generally speaking, the chief reason a mother undergoes abortion has to do with her relationships. While the bond between a mother and her child is real, that relationship is not the only one that bears upon her decision. The bond between a pregnant woman and the father to whom she has given herself is often also very deep, as are her relationships with her family and sometimes others. It is far from unusual for a mother to choose abortion due to pressure from one(s) important to her, people who don’t have the same bond with the unborn baby that that mother does.